Part of CNS 8.0 / Grounded Dialectical Orthesis

Sample CNS 8.0 Audit Report

Sample CNS 8.0 Audit Report

Synthesis status

Orthesis candidate: accepted

Strict claims

  1. Claim C1 follows from evidence e1, e2 under rule r_supports_from_entailment.
  2. Claim C2 follows from evidence e3 under rule r_refutes_from_entailment.

Likely claims

  1. Claim C3 has posterior 0.78 under worlds W1 and W2 but lacks zero-temperature proof.

Hypotheses

  1. Latent predicate dose_context explains residual contradiction and is supported by dosage spans in e1, e3.

Unresolved claims

  1. Subgroup interaction remains unresolved because subgroup records are not available.

Rejected claims

  1. Claim R1 rejected due to invalid citation doc_999.

Proof traces

C1 ← r_supports_from_entailment(e1, e2)
C2 ← r_refutes_from_entailment(e3)

Residual contradiction

Residual mass remains on:

Treatment X × reduces × Symptom Y × subgroup_unknown

Access gaps

  • subgroup stratification table: not_collected
  • adverse event appendix: withheld

Top worlds

WorldPosteriorNotes
W10.62dose context accepted, subgroup unresolved
W20.24dose and subgroup both relevant
W30.14measurement method explains conflict

Calibration

Likely-claim ECE: 0.11

Final note

The synthesis narrows the contradiction by dose context but does not erase subgroup uncertainty.