← Back to 20250617

100 grok plan

Documentation for 100_grok_plan from the Ds ex repository.

Below is a review of the evolution of ideas regarding the integration and architecture of DSPEx, Foundation, and ElixirScope, followed by my final plan for moving forward. This response is based on a comprehensive analysis of the development process, distilled into a clear and actionable strategy.

Evolution of Ideas

The journey to define the relationship and architecture of DSPEx, Foundation, and ElixirScope progressed through several key stages, each building on the previous one with new insights and refinements. Here’s how the thinking evolved:

  1. Initial Audit and Friction Identification

    • Context: The process began with an audit that highlighted friction between DSPEx (an AI/LLM engine) and Foundation (a supporting library). Foundation was being stretched beyond its generic design to meet DSPEx’s specialized needs, leading to fragile integrations.
    • Insight: Rather than decoupling, the recommendation was to co-design Foundation and DSPEx. Since both are under our control, tight integration could transform Foundation into a specialized AI Application Runtime, aligning with the broader vision of ElixirScope.

  2. Structured Data Challenges

    • Context: A critical gap emerged around handling structured data from LLMs. The Python library Pydantic was cited as a benchmark for robust schema definition and validation.
    • Insight: An Elixir equivalent, dubbed Exdantic, was proposed using Ecto for schema definition, JSON Schema generation, and validation. This would enhance DSPEx’s reliability by ensuring typed, validated LLM outputs.

  3. Deep Integration Pain Points

    • Context: A detailed analysis of DSPEx’s reliance on Foundation revealed a pervasive but unstable relationship. Issues included fragile configuration management, telemetry, and lifecycle dependencies.
    • Insight: The integration’s depth suggested that evolving Foundation into an AI-specific platform could address these issues, providing resilience, observability, and schema support natively.

  4. Vision of Foundation as an AI Runtime

    • Context: The idea crystallized that Foundation should shift from a generic toolkit to a specialized runtime for AI applications, with DSPEx as its core engine.
    • Insight: This vision promised a cohesive platform with a superior developer experience, but it required significant refactoring, raising questions about scope and feasibility.

  5. Three-Tier Architecture Proposal

    • Context: To clarify roles, a three-tier structure was proposed: Foundation as the platform, DSPEx as the engine, and ElixirScope as the application.
    • Insight: This model provided clear separation of concerns, with Foundation handling infrastructure, DSPEx focusing on AI logic, and ElixirScope delivering the end-user product.

  6. Modular Dependency Refinement

    • Context: Further refinement introduced Exdantic and ExLLMAdapter as potential standalone libraries for structured data and LLM communication, respectively.
    • Insight: A modular ecosystem emerged as a long-term goal, but the immediate complexity of managing multiple libraries prompted a reassessment.

  7. Pragmatic Approach

    • Context: Recognizing the risks of over-engineering, the focus shifted to a practical, incremental plan within DSPEx before extracting components into separate libraries.
    • Insight: This approach prioritized stabilizing the current system, proving new features, and deferring major refactors until their value was demonstrated.

Final Plan

Based on this evolution, my plan balances immediate improvements with a long-term vision. It focuses on stabilizing DSPEx, integrating critical features like Exdantic and structured LLM communication, and deferring extensive Foundation refactoring until the core concepts are proven. Here’s the step-by-step strategy:

Step 1: Stabilize the Current Integration

  • Goal: Reduce fragility in DSPEx’s interactions with Foundation.
  • Action:
    • Create a facade module, DSPEx.Foundation.Client, as the single point of contact with Foundation.
    • Encapsulate all Foundation calls (e.g., telemetry, configuration) within this module, handling errors consistently with a {:error, :foundation_unavailable} tuple.
    • Update DSPEx modules to use this facade, simplifying error handling and isolating Foundation’s instability.
  • Timeline: 1-2 days.

Step 2: Implement Exdantic MVP

  • Goal: Add robust structured data support within DSPEx.
  • Action:
    • Develop DSPEx.Schema as a module inside DSPEx, leveraging Ecto for:
      • Schema definition via use DSPEx.Schema and embedded_schema.
      • JSON Schema generation with a to_json_schema/1 function.
      • Validation and parsing with from_llm_json/1 using Ecto.Changeset.
    • Keep it simple and contained within DSPEx for now, avoiding a separate library.
  • Timeline: 1 week.

Step 3: Build Structured LLM Adapter

  • Goal: Enable reliable, structured LLM outputs in DSPEx.
  • Action:
    • Add a function, DSPEx.Client.request_structured/3, to DSPEx.Client that:
      • Takes a prompt, a DSPEx.Schema module, and options.
      • Generates the JSON Schema using DSPEx.Schema.to_json_schema/1.
      • Constructs a provider-specific request (e.g., Gemini’s structured output API).
      • Validates the response with DSPEx.Schema.from_llm_json/1.
    • Start with one provider (e.g., Gemini) to keep it focused.
  • Timeline: 1 week.

Step 4: Integrate and Demonstrate

  • Goal: Prove the value of the new features in a real use case.
  • Action:
    • Refactor DSPEx.PredictStructured to use DSPEx.Client.request_structured/3 and DSPEx.Schema.
    • Test with a sample schema (e.g., fields like answer:string, confidence:float) to showcase typed, validated LLM outputs.
    • Validate that it delivers a seamless developer experience and reliable results.
  • Timeline: A few hours.

Step 5: Defer Major Refactors

  • Goal: Avoid premature complexity while focusing on immediate value.
  • Action:
    • Postpone extensive Foundation refactoring into an AI Application Platform until Exdantic and the structured adapter are stable and proven within DSPEx.
    • Revisit the three-tier architecture (Foundation as platform, DSPEx as engine, ElixirScope as application) and library extractions (Exdantic, ExLLMAdapter) once the core functionality matures.
  • Timeline: Ongoing evaluation.

Why This Plan?

  • Incremental Progress: It builds on the existing DSPEx codebase, delivering value step-by-step without requiring a massive upfront refactor.
  • Risk Mitigation: By stabilizing first and proving new features within DSPEx, we avoid overcommitting to an untested architecture.
  • Foundation for Growth: It lays the groundwork for future modularity (e.g., extracting Exdantic or ExLLMAdapter) once their boundaries and value are clear.
  • Alignment with Vision: It moves toward a cohesive AI platform in Elixir while keeping development manageable and focused on immediate needs.

This plan ensures that DSPEx, Foundation, and ElixirScope evolve into a powerful, maintainable ecosystem, starting with practical improvements and scaling strategically over time.