2. Integration with ex_llm
Fit: This is a perfect complement. ex_llm
is a comprehensive framework for communicating with LLMs, while elixact
is a library for defining and validating the data you exchange. They can be used together as distinct layers without modification to either library.
How it Would Work (The “Clean Layer” Approach):
You don’t need to change ex_llm
at all. You use ex_llm
as your LLM “engine” and elixact
as your data validation layer.
Here is a typical workflow for your DSPy port:
Define a Signature/Schema: Use
elixact
to define your desired output structure. This can be a compile-time module or a runtimeEnhancedSchema
.defmodule MyOutput do use Elixact, define_struct: true schema do field :answer, :string, description: "The final answer." field :confidence, :integer, constraints: [gt: 0, lt: 100] computed_field :assessment, :string, :assess_confidence end def assess_confidence(input), do: {:ok, if(input.confidence > 80, do: "high", else: "low")} end
Generate JSON Schema: Use
elixact
to generate the JSON schema for the provider.# Use the enhanced resolver for provider-specific optimizations json_schema = Elixact.JsonSchema.EnhancedResolver.resolve_enhanced( MyOutput, optimize_for_provider: :openai )
Make the LLM Call with
ex_llm
: Useex_llm
to make the API call, passing the generated JSON schema to the provider to ensure it returns structured data. (Note: This assumes the provider supports it, which many inex_llm
do).# This is a hypothetical way to use ex_llm with a JSON schema constraint # The actual implementation might vary based on the provider adapter options = [ model: "openai/gpt-4o", response_format: %{type: "json_object", schema: json_schema} ] {:ok, response} = ExLLM.chat(:openai, messages, options)
Validate the Response with
elixact
: Take the raw text content from theex_llm
response and validate it usingelixact
.# response.content contains the JSON string from the LLM json_data = Jason.decode!(response.content) case Elixact.EnhancedValidator.validate(MyOutput, json_data) do {:ok, %MyOutput{} = result} -> # Success! You have a validated struct with computed fields. IO.inspect(result) {:error, errors} -> # Handle validation errors, perhaps by retrying the ex_llm call # with an error message, similar to the instructor pattern. IO.inspect(errors) end
Synergy and Benefits:
- Separation of Concerns:
ex_llm
handles all the complex infrastructure (API clients, retries, caching, observability, local models), whileelixact
handles the data modeling and validation logic. This is a very clean and robust architecture. - Full
ex_llm
Feature Set: You get access to all ofex_llm
’s featuresāBumblebee integration, circuit breakers, cost trackingāwhile still using your powerful, custom validation layer. - No Modifications Needed: This approach requires no changes to either library. You are composing them together as they are.
Conclusion for ex_llm
:
This is the most powerful and scalable approach for your DSPy port. It leverages the best of both worlds: ex_llm
as a best-in-class LLM interaction framework and elixact
as a best-in-class Pydantic-style data validation library.
Final Recommendation for Your DSPy Port
For your DSPy port, the ex_llm
+ elixact
combination is the clear winner.
A DSPy-like framework needs two main components:
- An LM (Language Model) client: This is the piece that sends prompts to an LLM and gets back a response.
ex_llm
is a superb, feature-complete implementation of this. - A Signature and Validation system: This is the piece that defines the expected inputs and outputs and validates them.
elixact
, with its Pydantic-like runtime capabilities, is the perfect Elixir equivalent for this part of DSPy.
Your framework would sit on top, orchestrating the interaction between these two powerful libraries. This layered approach is clean, maintainable, and gives you immense power out of the box.