Now let me create a summary document that ties everything together:## Summary
I’ve provided a comprehensive solution to address the fundamental issue you identified: the tests expect API contracts that don’t exist in the DSPEx implementation.
What I’ve Delivered:
๐ Problem Analysis: Confirmed that tests were modified to expect APIs like
Program.safe_program_info/1
,has_demos?/1
, enhancedforward/3
, etc., but these were never implemented in the library code.๐ Formal API Contract Specification: Complete specification of what SIMBA needs from DSPEx, with clear requirements for each API.
๐ ๏ธ Implementation Roadmap: 3-day phased implementation plan with specific tasks, timelines, and success criteria.
๐ป Ready-to-Apply Code Patches: Exact code modifications needed for:
lib/dspex/program.ex
- Missing introspection functionslib/dspex/optimized_program.ex
- SIMBA metadata supportlib/dspex/services/config_manager.ex
- SIMBA configuration pathslib/dspex/client.ex
- Response format stabilizationlib/dspex/teleprompter/bootstrap_fewshot.ex
- Empty demo handlinglib/dspex/services/telemetry_setup.ex
- SIMBA telemetry events
๐งช Comprehensive Test Suite: Contract validation tests that ensure all SIMBA requirements are met, including integration smoke tests.
Critical Implementation Priority:
๐ด CRITICAL BLOCKERS that must be implemented before SIMBA:
- Program.forward/3 with options support
- Program introspection functions (program_type, safe_program_info, has_demos)
- Client response format stability
- OptimizedProgram metadata support
- ConfigManager SIMBA configuration paths
This provides the formal API contract definition and implementation guide needed to bridge DSPEx and SIMBA successfully. The implementation should take 2-3 focused days and will resolve the fundamental contract mismatch issue.