Enhancing Foundation: A Deep Dive into Elixir/Erlang Infrastructure Primitives

Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of Elixir and Erlang packages that can facilitate or entirely fulfill the requirements of the “Foundation Enhancement Series IV: Advanced Infrastructure Primitives.” The proposed enhancements aim to bolster core infrastructure capabilities for complex, distributed Elixir applications. The analysis systematically examines five key areas: Dynamic Resource Discovery and Service Mesh, Advanced Data Pipeline Framework, Intelligent Caching with Machine Learning, Event Sourcing and CQRS Infrastructure, and Advanced Distributed State Management.

The findings indicate that while Elixir and Erlang offer robust primitives for distributed systems, achieving the advanced functionalities outlined often necessitates a combination of mature community libraries and targeted custom development. For dynamic resource discovery, Swarm is highly recommended for internal process management, complemented by MeshxConsul for a full-featured external service mesh. Data pipelines benefit significantly from Broadway for ingestion and Flow for complex transformations, with ExternalService ensuring resilient external interactions and ErrorMessage standardizing error handling. Intelligent caching, particularly with machine learning, is best approached by leveraging Nebulex for its multi-tier capabilities and Cachex for individual tier implementations, while Nx, Axon, and Bumblebee form the core for the predictive models. Event Sourcing and CQRS can be effectively implemented using Commanded or Incident as frameworks, with EventStore serving as a robust, PostgreSQL-backed persistence layer. Finally, advanced distributed state management finds its foundation in DeltaCrdt, with Horde simplifying distributed supervision and registry, and vector_clock providing crucial causality tracking. The report concludes with actionable recommendations for integrating these components to build highly scalable, resilient, and intelligent distributed Elixir applications.

1. Introduction to Foundation Enhancements

The “Foundation Enhancement Series IV: Advanced Infrastructure Primitives” represents a critical step in evolving the core capabilities of the Foundation library. These proposals are designed to provide a robust bedrock for any complex, distributed Elixir application, including DSPEx, by addressing common challenges in scalability, resilience, and operational efficiency. The strategic importance of these improvements cannot be overstated, as they directly impact an application’s ability to handle increasing load, maintain high availability, and support sophisticated functionalities.

The series comprises five distinct, yet interconnected, enhancements:

• Enhancement 21: Dynamic Resource Discovery and Service Mesh: This enhancement focuses on establishing intelligent service discovery mechanisms that can adapt to changing network topologies and automatically route requests to optimal service instances. It aims to incorporate health-aware load balancing and circuit protection for enhanced resilience.
• Enhancement 22: Advanced Data Pipeline Framework: The goal here is to create sophisticated data processing pipelines. These pipelines are envisioned with advanced transformation stages, comprehensive error recovery strategies, and effective backpressure management to ensure reliable and efficient data flow.
• Enhancement 23: Intelligent Caching with Machine Learning: This proposal outlines a self-optimizing cache system. The cache is designed to learn access patterns and predict future data needs, enabling proactive cache warming and intelligent eviction policies to maximize performance.
• Enhancement 24: Event Sourcing and CQRS Infrastructure: This enhancement seeks to provide a production-ready framework for event sourcing. It includes support for projections to build read models, snapshotting for performance optimization, and a clear separation of commands and queries (CQRS) for architectural clarity and scalability.
• Enhancement 25: Advanced Distributed State Management: The final enhancement focuses on implementing sophisticated distributed state synchronization. This involves mechanisms for automatic conflict resolution and guarantees of eventual consistency, crucial for highly available and partition-tolerant systems.

Each of these enhancements, while distinct, contributes to a holistic vision of a resilient and performant distributed system built on the Elixir and Erlang/OTP ecosystem.

2. Dynamic Resource Discovery and Service Mesh

Enhancement 21 envisions a dynamic service mesh that intelligently discovers and routes requests to optimal service instances within a distributed system. The proposed Foundation.ServiceMesh module includes functions for register_service, discover_service, and route_request, while Foundation.ServiceMesh.HealthMonitor provides health checking capabilities. This aims to create a system where services can adapt to changing network topologies and automatically balance load based on health and other criteria.

The Elixir and Erlang ecosystem offers several packages and built-in features that can either directly contribute to or entirely fulfill this enhancement.

Relevant Elixir/Erlang Packages

For Service Discovery & Registry, several options are available:

• Swarm is a robust library for distributed process management and dynamic service discovery.1 It provides a multi-master, distributed global process registry, allowing processes to join and leave groups and manage members.3 A key capability is register_name, which allows processes to be globally registered and, importantly, can restart processes on new nodes if the cluster topology changes, ensuring continued service availability.3 This makes Swarm highly suitable for maintaining a dynamic registry of service instances.
• OTP Built-ins (:global, :pg2) offer foundational process discovery mechanisms. The :global module allows for cluster-wide process registration, where a cluster-wide lock is set during registration to ensure unique aliases. Subsequent lookups are fast, as registration information is cached locally on all nodes.4 The :pg2 module enables the creation of arbitrarily named cluster-wide groups, with group creations and joins propagated across the cluster. It also automatically detects process crashes and node disconnects, removing non-existent processes from the group.4 These OTP modules provide core distributed registry functionality.
• oltarasenko/erlang-node-discovery is a package that assists in organizing Erlang/Elixir node discovery using configuration. This can be particularly useful in environments like Mesos where relying on the standard distribution protocol (EPMD) might not be ideal.6

For Service Mesh & Load Balancing, more specialized solutions emerge:

• Meshx is a suite of Elixir packages designed to provide service mesh support.7
  • MeshxConsul acts as an adapter for HashiCorp Consul (control plane) and leverages Envoy or other proxies as the data plane. It offers comprehensive service mesh features such as mTLS connections, service-to-service permissions (intentions), mesh service health checks, load balancing, observability, and multi-datacenter communication via gateways.8 This aligns closely with the advanced service mesh concept.
  • MeshxRpc provides RPC functionality as an alternative to Erlang’s :erpc or :rpc modules. It uses a custom binary communication protocol, making it independent of the standard Erlang distribution protocol, and includes features like binary data chunking and checksums.8
  • MeshxNode delivers Erlang-style node connectivity by registering a special “node service” through a service mesh adapter. It facilitates inter-node communication via service mesh sidecar proxies, offering a high-availability alternative to EPMD and standard distribution modules.8
• External Load Balancers such as Nginx and HAProxy are commonly deployed to distribute incoming HTTP traffic across multiple instances of an Elixir application. These load balancers employ various algorithms, including round-robin or least connections, to intelligently distribute requests, thereby enhancing scalability and fault tolerance.1 They are crucial for handling traffic external to the BEAM cluster.
• BEAM’s Native Distribution Primitives provide the fundamental layer for distributed systems in Elixir. Processes within an Elixir/Erlang cluster exhibit location transparency, meaning messages can be sent between processes on the same node or different nodes with equal ease, given the recipient’s process ID.4 This inherent capability forms the backbone of any distributed service discovery mechanism.

For Health Monitoring, the following are relevant:

• The proposed Foundation library itself, in its v0.1.0 release, includes a “service discovery” component with “health checking”.11 This indicates an internal, application-level health monitoring capability that can be integrated with broader service discovery solutions.
• General BEAM capabilities allow for basic health monitoring through mechanisms like monitor_node/2, which detects changes in node connectivity.4 External systems like AWS ELB also provide detailed health check configurations, including parameters for health check intervals, paths, protocols, and thresholds.12

Comparative Analysis and Recommendations

The development of a dynamic resource discovery and service mesh in Elixir presents a dual-layered architectural consideration. The initial enhancement proposal for Foundation.ServiceMesh describes internal registration and discovery, which primarily operates within the boundaries of the BEAM cluster. The available packages reveal that solutions fall into two main categories: BEAM-native libraries and external service mesh integrations. BEAM-native solutions, such as Swarm, :global, and :pg2, excel at providing process-level location transparency and distributed registries within the Erlang cluster.3 These offer high performance for intra-cluster communication but typically lack the advanced Layer 7 features, such as mTLS, sophisticated traffic splitting, and deep observability, that are characteristic of a full-fledged service mesh. Conversely, external service meshes, exemplified by Consul/Envoy (integrated via MeshxConsul), provide these advanced L7 capabilities. They operate at the application instance level and are often tightly integrated with container orchestration platforms.8 For a truly “intelligent service mesh” as outlined in the enhancement, a hybrid approach is likely the most effective. External service meshes manage network-level traffic, security, and observability between application instances, while BEAM-native libraries handle the dynamic discovery and routing of processes within the Elixir cluster. The Foundation.ServiceMesh proposal, as currently structured, appears to lean towards an internal, BEAM-native implementation. This approach would be sufficient for intra-application service routing but would require integration with an external mesh for cross-service communication or more advanced traffic control features.

A significant architectural decision revolves around the “build vs. buy” dilemma for load balancing and advanced routing. While the BEAM provides primitives for inter-node communication and process groups (:pg2, Swarm), it explicitly states that it does not offer load balancing out of the box.14 Implementing advanced load balancing, such as least-loaded routing based on real-time metrics, would necessitate substantial custom development, including careful management of distributed state and potentially complex metrics collection using tools like cpu_sup (though this approach is cautioned against due to inherent complexity).14 For external traffic, established external load balancers like Nginx and HAProxy represent mature and reliable solutions.1 For internal service-to-service load balancing, MeshxConsul provides a ready-made, feature-rich solution by integrating with proven service mesh technologies.8 If the objective is a purely internal, BEAM-native “service mesh” without external dependencies, then Swarm combined with custom load-selection logic (e.g., round-robin or simple health-aware distribution) would be the chosen path, accepting the associated development overhead.

For a comprehensive “Dynamic Resource Discovery and Service Mesh,” the following recommendations are made:

• Leverage Swarm for dynamic, distributed process registration and group management within the Elixir cluster. Its robust capabilities and API compatibility make it a superior alternative to :global and :pg2 for most modern use cases.2 Its ability to automatically restart processes on new nodes is crucial for maintaining high availability.
• Integrate MeshxConsul if the application requires a full-featured service mesh, including mTLS, advanced traffic management, and external observability. This approach effectively bridges Elixir applications with battle-tested external solutions like Consul and Envoy.8
• Utilize Foundation’s internal health checking component for application-specific health signals.11 These signals can then feed into Swarm’s process management or MeshxConsul’s health checks to ensure accurate routing decisions.
• For external client-facing traffic, continue to rely on external load balancers like Nginx or HAProxy.1

The following table provides a comparative overview of the discussed packages and systems:

Table 2.1: Service Discovery & Mesh Package Comparison

This table systematically compares different approaches to service discovery and service mesh in the Elixir/Erlang ecosystem. It highlights the distinction between BEAM-native, process-level solutions and external, infrastructure-level service mesh integrations. This allows for a clear understanding of where each package fits in the overall architecture, enabling architects to make informed decisions based on specific requirements for internal versus external traffic management, desired level of control, and feature set (e.g., mTLS, advanced traffic routing). The maturity column aids in assessing potential risks.

3. Advanced Data Pipeline Framework

Enhancement 22 proposes an advanced data processing pipeline framework, encompassing sophisticated transformation stages, robust error recovery, and effective backpressure management. The provided Foundation.Pipeline module outlines functions like create_pipeline, process_item, and process_stream, with an Executor handling stage execution and error strategies such as :retry, :skip, :fail, and :default_value. This framework emphasizes concurrency, buffering, and metrics collection.

Relevant Elixir/Erlang Packages

For Data Pipeline Frameworks, several prominent libraries are available:

• Broadway is a concurrent, multi-stage tool specifically designed for data ingestion and processing pipelines built on GenStage.15 It offers built-in features including backpressure, automatic acknowledgements, batching, fault tolerance, graceful shutdown, custom failure handling (handle_failed/2), ordering and partitioning, rate limiting, and metrics. Broadway is particularly recommended for continuous, long-running pipelines.15
• Flow provides a more general abstraction for parallel computations on collections, also leveraging GenStage.15 Flow focuses on data transformation, offering features like aggregation, joins, windows, and partitioning to ensure concurrency and correctness. It is suitable for both short-lived and long-lived data processing tasks. Community discussions suggest that Broadway can serve as an effective gateway for Flow when processing AMQP events.19
• Espresso is an Erlang/Elixir stream processing library that draws parallels with Apache Flink or Kafka Stream API.20 It defines core concepts of Source, Sink, and Processor (each implemented as concurrent Actors), enabling MapReduce-like operations from diverse inputs (e.g., files, sockets, Kafka, RabbitMQ) to various outputs.

For Backpressure Management, specific tools and features are crucial:

• Broadway explicitly implements backpressure using GenStage, ensuring that it only retrieves the necessary volume of events from upstream sources, thereby preventing pipeline overload.16
• sbroker is a queuing system that provides backpressure mechanisms designed to prevent queues from growing indefinitely. It offers different queue types, such as sbroker_timeout_queue and sbroker_drop_queue, for fine-grained control over message flow.21
• gen_buffer is a highly scalable message buffer that supports pooling, backpressure, sharding, and distribution.22 It allows for dynamic adjustment of worker numbers (via incr_worker and decr_worker functions) to throttle throughput and processing rates effectively.22

For Error Recovery & Resilience, the Elixir ecosystem provides several robust mechanisms:

• The “Let it crash” philosophy and Supervision Trees are central to Elixir/Erlang’s fault tolerance model.23 Supervisors automatically restart processes to a known good state upon failure. However, this approach requires careful consideration for long-lived processes that maintain mutable state, as a restart can lead to state loss.23
• ErrorMessage offers a structured and consistent approach to representing errors. It provides a clear format including a code, a human-readable message, and detailed context, which facilitates robust pattern matching on error codes and significantly improves debuggability, moving beyond fragile string-based error messages.26
• ExternalService is an Elixir library designed for safe interaction with external services or APIs. It incorporates customizable retry logic, automatic rate limiting, and the circuit breaker pattern.28 This library utilizes the retry library 30 for flexible backoff strategies and can trigger retries based on specific return values or exceptions.
• Peeper is a library that addresses the challenge of state loss for long-lived GenServer processes by enabling state saving during restarts.23 While it offers a “drop-in replacement” for GenServer, its use requires careful consideration of potential issues, such as masking underlying problems.
• The Dead Letter Queues (DLQ) pattern is a common architectural approach for handling messages that fail processing.31 Although not a specific Elixir package, Broadway’s custom failure handling (handle_failed/2) can be leveraged to implement DLQ logic, as Broadway itself does not provide built-in retry mechanisms.16
• Elixir’s with statement is a powerful control flow construct for chaining dependent operations. It allows for a flattened, more readable approach to handling errors, particularly when dealing with {:ok, :error} tuples, by modeling the “happy path” and centralizing error handling.34

Comparative Analysis and Recommendations

The design of a comprehensive data pipeline framework in Elixir benefits from the complementary roles of Broadway and Flow. The proposed Foundation.Pipeline handles both single item processing and streaming data. Broadway is explicitly designed for “continuous, long-running pipelines” and excels in “operational features” such as data ingestion, backpressure, and fault tolerance.15 In contrast, Flow serves as a “general abstraction” for “parallel computations on collections,” providing capabilities like aggregation, joins, and windows.15 Community discussions suggest that Broadway can effectively act as a gateway for Flow when processing events from message brokers.19 This architectural understanding suggests that Broadway is optimally suited for the initial ingestion and reliable handling of external data streams, ensuring backpressure and fault tolerance at the entry point. Once data is reliably ingested, Flow can then be employed for complex, parallel in-memory transformations, aggregations, and windowing operations within the pipeline stages. This division of responsibilities leverages the unique strengths of each library, resulting in a highly robust and flexible data processing architecture.

A critical aspect of a resilient data pipeline is the implementation of layered error recovery and backpressure mechanisms. The Foundation.Pipeline proposal includes an error_strategy for various failure scenarios. The analysis shows that ExternalService provides comprehensive retry logic and circuit breakers for interactions with external systems 28, while Broadway offers custom failure handling but delegates retry responsibility to the producer.16 For internal flow control, sbroker and gen_buffer offer explicit backpressure capabilities.21 The foundational “let it crash” philosophy, while powerful, requires careful application for stateful processes to avoid data loss.23 Furthermore, ErrorMessage standardizes error reporting across the system.26 This suggests that a robust data pipeline requires a multi-layered approach to error handling and backpressure. External interactions should be shielded by ExternalService’s circuit breakers and retry mechanisms. Internal pipeline stages should utilize Broadway’s backpressure and custom failure handling (e.g., routing failed messages to a Dead Letter Queue), and gen_buffer or sbroker can provide fine-grained flow control within specific, high-throughput stages. For long-lived stateful processes, Peeper can mitigate state loss upon restarts, but the “let it crash” philosophy remains the ultimate safety net, with ErrorMessage ensuring consistent error propagation and improved debuggability throughout the entire system.

For an “Advanced Data Pipeline Framework,” the following recommendations are made:

• Utilize Broadway as the primary framework for data ingestion and the initial stages of the pipeline, leveraging its built-in backpressure, fault tolerance, and custom failure handling.15
• Integrate Flow for complex in-memory data transformations, aggregations, and stream processing within Broadway’s processors, particularly for operations requiring parallel execution and windowing.15
• Employ ExternalService for all interactions with external APIs or services within the pipeline, ensuring robust retry mechanisms, rate limiting, and circuit breaking capabilities.28
• Consider gen_buffer or sbroker for fine-grained buffering and backpressure control within specific, high-throughput pipeline stages, if Broadway’s native backpressure proves insufficient for internal bottlenecks.21
• Adopt ErrorMessage for standardized error representation and handling across the entire pipeline, significantly improving consistency and debuggability.26
• For critical long-lived stateful processes within the pipeline, investigate Peeper for state persistence across restarts, while carefully understanding its associated trade-offs.23

The following table provides a comparative overview of the discussed packages and systems:

Table 3.1: Data Pipeline Framework Comparison

This table provides a clear comparison of the primary data pipeline frameworks and supporting libraries. It differentiates between ingestion-focused and transformation-focused tools, and highlights dedicated solutions for backpressure and external service resilience. The inclusion of ErrorMessage underscores the importance of standardized error handling across the pipeline. This comprehensive overview aids in understanding how these components can be combined to construct a robust, multi-faceted data pipeline.

4. Intelligent Caching with Machine Learning

Enhancement 23 proposes a self-optimizing cache that learns access patterns and predicts future data needs, incorporating a multi-tier architecture. The Foundation.IntelligentCache module outlines the use of L1, L2, and L3 caches, along with components for access_patterns, a prediction_model, and a warming_scheduler. It includes functionality for get_or_compute, ML-based optimization via handle_info(:optimize_cache), and determine_optimal_cache_tier using features derived from the ML model. A simple MLModel with decision rules is also described.

Relevant Elixir/Erlang Packages

For Caching Libraries, several options cater to different needs:

• Cachex is a powerful and fast in-memory key/value store.35 It supports distributed caching through a Cachex.Router, often based on a hash-ring, which distributes keys across nodes and automatically redistributes them upon :nodeup and :nodedown events.37 Cachex offers extensive features such as Time-to-Live (TTL), fallbacks, locking mechanisms, proactive/reactive warming, and transactions. Crucially, it provides strong extensibility points via “pre/post execution hooks” and “custom command invocation”.36
• Nebulex is a flexible and highly configurable caching library that supports both in-memory and distributed caching.35 It explicitly supports multi-level caching through its Nebulex.Adapters.Multilevel module, which defaults to a 2-level hierarchy (L1 local, L2 partitioned). It also provides partitioned caches via Nebulex.Adapters.Partitioned.40 Nebulex is designed with a pluggable adapter architecture, allowing for custom implementations.42
• ConCache is an ETS-based concurrent caching library that offers row-level isolated writes and TTL support.35
• ETS (Erlang Term Storage) is a core Erlang feature providing an in-memory key-value store, frequently used for caching in Elixir applications.35 It is inherently local to a node and does not natively support clustering or replication.44
• Mnesia is a distributed database management system included with Erlang/OTP. It can be utilized for caching, particularly in distributed Elixir applications.35
• Redix is an Elixir client library that enables applications to interact with external Redis instances, a widely adopted choice for distributed caching solutions.35
• elixir_cache aims to unify cache APIs and simplify the implementation and sharing of caching strategies across various storage types/adapters (e.g., Agent, DETS, ETS, Redis, ConCache).45

For Machine Learning for Optimization, the following libraries are foundational:

• Nx is the core library for Numerical Elixir, providing n-dimensional tensors and a comprehensive set of functions for numerical computations.46 Its Nx.Defn component enables Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation of numerical definitions to run efficiently on CPU or GPU, which is critical for performance-intensive machine learning operations.48
• Axon serves as a high-level interface for constructing neural network models, built entirely on top of Nx.46 It supports various aspects of model creation, custom layers, execution, and training. Axon models can be deployed in production using Nx.Serving for efficient batching of prediction requests.50
• Bumblebee provides access to pre-trained Axon models and integrates seamlessly with the Hugging Face Hub, streamlining the process of loading and utilizing state-of-the-art models for inference.46 It also offers “servings” that represent end-to-end machine learning pipelines, handling pre-processing, model inference, and post-processing.
• The broader Elixir ML Ecosystem is rapidly expanding, with libraries supporting diverse tasks such as pattern recognition, time series forecasting (e.g., NeuralProphet), and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) systems (e.g., rag).47

Regarding Cache Eviction Policies, traditional strategies include Least Recently Used (LRU), Least Frequently Used (LFU), First-In-First-Out (FIFO), and Random Replacement.53 These policies are typically configurable options within caching libraries or can be implemented manually.

Comparative Analysis and Recommendations

The implementation of “Intelligent Caching with Machine Learning” as proposed, which specifies L1, L2, and L3 caches, finds strong support in Nebulex for its multi-tier capabilities and Cachex for its extensibility. Nebulex explicitly supports “Multilevel Cache” with a configurable hierarchy, making it the clear choice for architecting and managing cache levels.40 It also supports partitioned caches and features a pluggable adapter architecture.42 Cachex, while primarily a powerful single-node cache, also offers robust distributed capabilities and significant extensibility through hooks and warmers.36 While Cachex can be used as an adapter for Nebulex 40, Cachex itself does not explicitly advertise multi-tier support in the provided information. Therefore, Nebulex is optimally suited for establishing the multi-tier caching structure, while Cachex would be an excellent choice for implementing the individual tiers (e.g., L1/L2 in-memory), given its performance and powerful features. The Foundation.IntelligentCache could leverage Nebulex for its multi-tier structure and then use Cachex (or ETS/ConCache via elixir_cache adapters) for the actual cache implementations at each tier.

Integrating machine learning for predictive caching is not a ready-made package but rather a sophisticated integration task. The Foundation.IntelligentCache proposal includes a prediction_model and warming_scheduler designed to learn access patterns and predict optimal tiers. The Elixir ML ecosystem provides Nx for numerical computation, Axon for building neural networks, and Bumblebee for leveraging pre-trained models.46 However, none of the existing caching libraries (Cachex, Nebulex, ElixirCache) explicitly offer built-in machine learning-driven optimization. Instead, Cachex provides “pre/post execution hooks” and “warmers” 36, and Nebulex features a pluggable adapter architecture.42 This indicates that the machine learning model (developed using Nx/Axon/Bumblebee) would need to be custom-built to analyze access patterns and predict optimal caching strategies (e.g., which items to proactively warm, which tier to store data in, or how to dynamically adjust eviction policies). This ML logic would then be integrated into the chosen caching framework’s extensibility points. For instance, Cachex’s warmers or hooks could be used for proactive warming or dynamic eviction, or a custom Nebulex adapter could be developed for dynamic tiering decisions. This approach implies significant custom development to bridge the machine learning and caching components effectively.

For “Intelligent Caching with Machine Learning,” the following recommendations are made:

• Adopt Nebulex as the primary caching framework due to its explicit support for multi-level caching and its flexible adapter architecture, which allows for defining L1, L2, and L3 tiers.40
• Utilize Cachex as the underlying implementation for one or more of Nebulex’s tiers (e.g., L1 or L2) due to its high performance and robust feature set.35
• Leverage Nx, Axon, and Bumblebee to build and deploy the machine learning model responsible for learning access patterns, predicting future needs, and determining optimal caching strategies.46
• Implement custom logic using Cachex’s hooks or warmers, or by developing a custom Nebulex adapter, to integrate the machine learning model’s predictions into the cache’s operations.36 This integration would involve feeding access data to the ML model and using its outputs to inform caching decisions, such as proactive warming, dynamic eviction policy adjustments, or tier promotion/demotion.
• For distributed aspects, ensure Cachex’s distributed router is configured 37 or Nebulex’s partitioned adapter is appropriately used.42

The following table provides a comparative overview of the discussed packages and systems:

Table 4.1: Caching Library Comparison

This table is crucial for understanding the landscape of caching and machine learning integration in Elixir. It clearly distinguishes between general-purpose caching libraries and specialized machine learning libraries. Critically, it highlights that the “intelligent” aspect of the cache is not a ready-made feature but an integration challenge. This requires custom machine learning logic, built upon Nx, Axon, and Bumblebee, which must then be integrated through the extensibility points of libraries like Cachex or Nebulex. The table helps identify the most suitable tools for each component of this complex enhancement.

5. Event Sourcing and CQRS Infrastructure

Enhancement 24 aims to establish a production-ready event sourcing and CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation) infrastructure. This includes robust management of aggregates, commands, events, projections, and snapshots. The provided Foundation.EventSourcing module demonstrates functions for create_aggregate, execute_command, create_projection, and query_projection. The Foundation.EventSourcing.Aggregate handles command execution, event application, and storage, while Foundation.EventSourcing.Projection manages event processing and query handling, with an emphasis on event replay and snapshotting.

Relevant Elixir/Erlang Packages

For Event Sourcing/CQRS Frameworks, several comprehensive libraries exist:

• Commanded is a comprehensive Elixir library specifically designed for building applications following the CQRS and Event Sourcing patterns.24 It offers robust support for command registration and dispatch, hosting and delegating operations to aggregate roots, event handling, and managing long-running process managers (sagas).56 Commanded integrates with Elixir EventStore (which uses PostgreSQL) for persistence.56 Furthermore, Commanded supports aggregate snapshotting as a performance optimization for aggregates that have accumulated a large number of events, allowing their state to be rebuilt from snapshots and only subsequent events.57
• Incident provides essential building blocks and abstractions for implementing Event Sourcing and CQRS in Elixir.60 Its architecture includes explicit data structures for Commands, Events, Aggregates, Aggregate States, Command Handlers, Event Handlers, and Projections. It features separate Event Store and Projection Store components with both InMemory and Postgres adapters. While aggregate snapshots are a planned feature for Incident 60, its modular design allows leveraging Elixir’s concurrency and facilitates stateless testing.
• AshEvents is an Event Sourcing tool tailored for applications built with the Ash Framework.62 It extends Ash resources with a Commanded-like DSL for defining commands, events, and projections, and dynamically generates the necessary modules.

For Event Stores, which are central to Event Sourcing:

• EventStore (v1.4.8) is a mature, production-ready event store backed by PostgreSQL.65 It provides a rich API for appending events to streams, reading events (both forward and backward, from all streams or single streams), and subscribing to event notifications (both transient and persistent subscriptions).65 Key features include optimistic concurrency checks, shared connection pools, backpressure (buffer_size), and checkpointing. It is known for its strong data integrity, being ACID-compliant and transactional.66
• ExESDB is a BEAM-native event store designed for building concurrent, distributed systems with Event Sourcing and CQRS.68 This offers a potentially higher-performance, native solution compared to external database-backed stores.

For Projections, which form the read models in CQRS:

• Commanded.Projections.Ecto is a dedicated library for building read model projections for Commanded applications, leveraging Ecto for persistence.24 It supports projecting domain events into read models within database transactions, including idempotency checks to prevent duplicate processing.
• Incident’s Projection Store, as part of the Incident library, provides configurable adapters (InMemory/Postgres) for storing aggregate projections. These projections function as a “persisted cache” for query data.60 Event Handlers within Incident are responsible for updating these projections based on incoming events.

For Snapshots, which optimize aggregate state reconstruction:

• Commanded supports aggregate snapshotting as a performance optimization for aggregates with a large number of events.24 Snapshots capture the aggregate state at a specific point in time, significantly reducing the need to replay all historical events from the beginning. For production environments, it recommends implementing a custom snapshot store that persists snapshots to a database, adhering to the AshCommanded.Commanded.SnapshotStore behavior.
• EventStore provides direct callbacks for record_snapshot, read_snapshot, and delete_snapshot 65, indicating built-in support for snapshot management at the event store level.
• Incident has “Event Snapshots” as a planned feature to improve performance for aggregates with long event histories.60

Comparative Analysis and Recommendations

The choice between Commanded as a comprehensive framework and Incident as a set of modular building blocks for Event Sourcing and CQRS depends on the project’s specific needs and team preferences. Commanded is characterized as a “full-featured CQRS pattern” 54 and a “comprehensive library” 56, providing a complete and opinionated structure for ES/CQRS implementations. It offers established snapshotting capabilities 57 and benefits from a mature ecosystem (e.g., Commanded.Projections.Ecto). In contrast, Incident is designed to provide “essential building blocks” and “abstractions” 60, offering a more flexible and granular approach. While Commanded has existing snapshotting support, Incident lists it as a planned feature.60 Both libraries support PostgreSQL for persistence.24 For projects that prefer a well-defined, opinionated framework that guides the implementation of CQRS/ES, Commanded is likely the more mature and complete choice. Conversely, for teams that favor more granular control, a “build-your-own” approach from smaller, composable components, or have specific requirements that might conflict with a framework’s opinions, Incident provides a flexible set of building blocks. The decision hinges on the team’s preference for framework-driven development versus modular composition.

The selection of the event store is a critical decision, as it forms the immutable heart of an Event Sourcing system, responsible for securely storing all state changes.62 EventStore, which is backed by PostgreSQL, is highlighted as a production-ready, ACID-compliant, transactional, and performant solution.66 It also provides crucial features such as subscriptions (essential for projections) and built-in snapshotting capabilities.65 ExESDB is mentioned as a BEAM-native alternative.68 The choice of event store is paramount for data integrity and system reliability. EventStore offers a robust and proven solution leveraging PostgreSQL, which provides strong guarantees for data integrity. While ExESDB presents a BEAM-native approach, its maturity and feature set (particularly concerning subscriptions and snapshots) would require careful evaluation against EventStore’s established capabilities. Regardless of the chosen framework (Commanded or Incident), EventStore appears to be a strong candidate for the underlying event persistence layer due to its comprehensive features and proven track record.

For “Event Sourcing and CQRS Infrastructure,” the following recommendations are made:

• Choose Commanded as the primary CQRS/ES framework if a comprehensive, opinionated solution is preferred, leveraging its robust command dispatch, aggregate management, event handling, and existing snapshotting features.56
• Alternatively, consider Incident if a more modular, building-block approach is desired, allowing for greater flexibility in composing the ES/CQRS components.60 It should be noted that snapshotting is a planned feature for Incident.60
• Utilize EventStore as the persistent event store, irrespective of the chosen framework. Its PostgreSQL backing provides strong data integrity, performance, and comprehensive features for event storage, subscriptions (for projections), and snapshots.65
• For read models, use Commanded.Projections.Ecto if Commanded is adopted 69, or configure Incident’s Projection Store with a PostgreSQL adapter.60

The following table provides a comparative overview of the discussed packages and systems:

Table 5.1: Event Sourcing & CQRS Framework Comparison

This table provides a direct comparison of the leading Event Sourcing and CQRS frameworks and the critical event store component. It highlights their architectural approaches (framework versus building blocks), persistence options, and the crucial aspect of snapshotting support. This comparative analysis aids in selecting the most appropriate framework based on the desired level of abstraction, maturity, and specific feature requirements for implementing Event Sourcing and CQRS.

6. Advanced Distributed State Management

Enhancement 25 focuses on implementing sophisticated distributed state synchronization, complete with conflict resolution and eventual consistency guarantees. The proposed Foundation.DistributedState module includes functions like create_distributed_object, update_state, get_state, and sync_with_nodes. The underlying Foundation.DistributedState.Object is designed to be CRDT-based, incorporating vector_clock, a consistency_model, and a conflict_resolution strategy (e.g., :last_writer_wins), with mechanisms for pending updates, periodic synchronization, and node monitoring.

Relevant Elixir/Erlang Packages

For CRDTs (Conflict-Free Replicated Data Types), which are central to this enhancement:

• DeltaCrdt is the foundational Elixir library for implementing Delta CRDTs.71 Delta CRDTs are highly efficient, transmitting only “deltas” (changes) rather than the entire state, which makes them highly scalable for distributed environments.73 DeltaCrdt implements Algorithm 2 from “Delta State Replicated Data Types – Almeida et al. 2016” as its anti-entropy algorithm and uses “join decomposition” to prevent unnecessary delta transmissions within a cluster.74 A key property of CRDTs is their ability to automatically resolve conflicts in a mathematically consistent way, guaranteeing eventual global convergence across all replicas.72 Examples of CRDT types supported include Add-Wins Last-Write-Wins Map (DeltaCrdt.AWLWWMap), where the latest write (based on timestamp) wins in case of conflict.76
• Horde is a distributed supervisor and a distributed registry built directly on top of DeltaCrdt.72 Horde provides capabilities such as automatic failover, dynamic cluster membership, and graceful node shutdown.85 It is an eventually consistent system, meaning that different nodes in the cluster may temporarily hold different views of the data, with these differences being merged as nodes synchronize.82 Horde automatically handles merge conflicts, with Horde.Registry sending an exit signal to the process that loses a conflict.86 Horde.DynamicSupervisor employs a hash ring to distribute processes and minimize race conditions during changes in cluster membership.82
• Phoenix Presence serves as a lightweight, real-world example of CRDT usage within the Elixir ecosystem. It is utilized for replicating presence information, such as users in a chat room, across a cluster.73

For Vector Clocks, which are crucial for causality:

• vector_clock is an Elixir implementation of vector clocks, drawing inspiration from :riak_core.87 Vector clocks are fundamental for maintaining a logical ordering of events and determining causality in distributed systems, without relying on synchronized physical clocks.87

For Distributed Registries & Process Groups, which manage distributed processes:

• Swarm is a fast, multi-master, distributed global process registry that supports automatic distribution of worker processes.1 It allows processes to join and leave groups and facilitates communication via multi_call and publish to group members. Swarm can also be configured to exhibit CP (consistent partitioned) behavior during network partitions, ensuring consistency over availability in such scenarios.88
• OTP Built-ins (:global, :pg2), as discussed in Enhancement 21, provide basic distributed process registration and group management capabilities.4

For Network Partition Handling, which is critical in distributed systems:

• The default behavior of the BEAM for network partitions can lead to “split-brain” scenarios, where isolated nodes evolve independently.89 Common strategies to mitigate this include shutting down minority partitions (e.g., pause_minority in the context of RabbitMQ) or electing a winning partition to maintain a consistent state.90
• Horde’s distribution_strategy (e.g., Horde.UniformDistribution or Horde.UniformQuorumDistribution) allows for configuring the system’s behavior during network partitions, enabling a trade-off between availability and consistency.82
• Spawn is a higher-level “Actor Mesh” framework that intelligently handles state persistence through timeouts and snapshot mechanisms. It aims to simplify distributed state management beyond directly using raw GenServer processes.91

Comparative Analysis and Recommendations

DeltaCrdt serves as the foundational enabler for eventual consistency in Elixir. The proposed enhancement explicitly mentions CRDTs as the underlying technology for distributed state management. DeltaCrdt is the core library in Elixir for this purpose, providing an efficient implementation of delta CRDTs.72 It acts as the fundamental building block for other powerful libraries like Horde.72 CRDTs inherently guarantee eventual consistency and automatic conflict resolution, ensuring that all replicas will eventually converge to the same state even in the presence of concurrent updates and network partitions.73 This library abstracts away the complex mathematical properties of CRDTs, offering a usable API for constructing distributed data structures that converge reliably. The choice of specific CRDT types within DeltaCrdt, such as AWLWWMap, will define the precise conflict resolution semantics.76

While DeltaCrdt provides the core CRDT functionality, Horde simplifies distributed process management atop CRDTs, but it requires careful handling of eventual consistency implications. Horde is explicitly built on DeltaCrdt to offer distributed supervision and a distributed registry.82 This directly addresses the need for managing distributed objects and processes as envisioned in the enhancement. However, Horde is an “eventually consistent” system, and it explicitly states that “you may end up with duplicate processes in your cluster” under certain network conditions, even though the underlying CRDT is designed to resolve conflicts.82 Managing state handoff during graceful shutdowns can be achieved by writing state to Horde.Registry’s meta-information, which is synchronized across the cluster using a CRDT.92 This approach can provide process continuity by allowing a new process to start on another node and pick up from where the failed process left off.92 However, the system must account for clumsy handoffs or network partitions where state synchronization might be incomplete, potentially requiring more complex state recovery logic from a database or event log.92 This highlights that while Horde significantly simplifies distributed process management, developers must design their applications to gracefully handle the temporary inconsistencies and potential duplicate processes that can arise in an eventually consistent system.

For “Advanced Distributed State Management,” the following recommendations are made:

• Utilize DeltaCrdt as the foundational library for implementing CRDT-based distributed state objects. It provides the core mechanisms for eventual consistency and automatic conflict resolution.72
• Employ Horde for distributed supervision and registry, leveraging its capabilities for automatic failover and dynamic cluster membership.82 This simplifies the management of distributed processes and objects.
• Integrate vector_clock to explicitly track causality and logical ordering of events across the distributed system, which is crucial for understanding the state evolution and for debugging.87
• Careful design is required to manage the implications of eventual consistency, particularly concerning network partitions and potential duplicate processes. Strategies for state handoff during graceful shutdowns, possibly leveraging Horde.Registry meta, should be implemented.92 For critical data requiring stronger consistency guarantees or reliable persistence, external databases should be considered.73

The following table provides a comparative overview of the discussed packages and systems:

Table 6.1: Distributed State Management Package Comparison

This table provides a comprehensive comparison of packages relevant to distributed state management. It highlights the foundational role of DeltaCrdt for achieving eventual consistency and automatic conflict resolution, and how Horde builds upon this to offer distributed supervision and registry. The inclusion of vector_clock emphasizes the importance of causality tracking. This analysis helps in selecting the appropriate tools for building robust and resilient distributed state management systems in Elixir.

7. Conclusions and Recommendations

The “Foundation Enhancement Series IV: Advanced Infrastructure Primitives” represents a strategic investment in the core capabilities of any complex, distributed Elixir application. The research indicates that the Elixir and Erlang/OTP ecosystem, with its inherent strengths in concurrency, fault tolerance, and distribution, provides a rich array of packages that can either directly fulfill or significantly assist in building out these advanced functionalities.

Key Conclusions:

• Layered Architecture is Key: For sophisticated infrastructure, a layered approach is consistently beneficial. This involves combining foundational BEAM primitives with specialized libraries and, where necessary, integrating with external, battle-tested solutions. This allows for optimal performance at different architectural levels (e.g., intra-cluster process management vs. inter-service traffic control).
• Build vs. Buy Decisions are Nuanced: While Elixir’s capabilities enable building highly customized solutions, leveraging mature community libraries often provides a faster path to production with reduced development overhead. For instance, MeshxConsul offers a ready-made service mesh integration, and Broadway provides robust data pipeline scaffolding, abstracting away significant complexity.
• Eventual Consistency Requires Careful Design: For distributed state management, CRDTs (Conflict-Free Replicated Data Types) offer powerful mechanisms for automatic conflict resolution and eventual consistency. However, developers must design their applications to gracefully handle the implications of eventual consistency, such as temporary data divergence or potential duplicate processes, even with sophisticated libraries like Horde.
• Extensibility is a Core Strength: Elixir’s functional nature and OTP’s GenServer model provide excellent extensibility points. This is particularly evident in areas like intelligent caching, where machine learning models can be integrated into existing caching frameworks (e.g., Cachex’s hooks or Nebulex’s adapters) through custom logic, rather than requiring entirely new, purpose-built solutions.
• Robust Error Handling is Multi-faceted: Beyond the “let it crash” philosophy, comprehensive error recovery in distributed systems demands a multi-layered strategy. This includes structured error reporting (ErrorMessage), resilient external service interactions (ExternalService with retries and circuit breakers), and internal backpressure mechanisms (Broadway, gen_buffer).

Actionable Recommendations:

1. For Dynamic Resource Discovery and Service Mesh:
   • Internal Service Discovery: Implement Swarm for dynamic, distributed process registration and group management within the Elixir cluster. This provides robust, high-availability process routing.
   • External Service Mesh: If advanced L7 features (mTLS, traffic splitting, fine-grained observability) are required, integrate MeshxConsul to leverage external service mesh technologies like Consul and Envoy.
   • Health Checks: Utilize Foundation’s internal health checking component to feed application-specific health signals into the chosen service discovery and mesh solutions.
2. For Advanced Data Pipeline Framework:
   • Core Pipeline Framework: Adopt Broadway for reliable data ingestion and initial pipeline stages, and integrate Flow for complex, parallel in-memory transformations and aggregations within those stages.
   • External Service Resilience: Employ ExternalService for all interactions with external APIs, ensuring robust retry mechanisms, rate limiting, and circuit breaking.
   • Internal Flow Control: Consider gen_buffer or sbroker for fine-grained buffering and backpressure management within specific high-throughput pipeline segments.
   • Standardized Error Handling: Mandate the use of ErrorMessage for consistent, structured error representation across the entire pipeline, enhancing debuggability and maintainability.
3. For Intelligent Caching with Machine Learning:
   • Multi-Tier Caching Architecture: Implement Nebulex to establish and manage the multi-level caching hierarchy (L1, L2, L3).
   • Tier Implementation: Use Cachex as the underlying implementation for one or more of Nebulex’s tiers due to its high performance and extensibility.
   • Machine Learning Model Development: Build the predictive caching model using Nx, Axon, and Bumblebee.
   • ML Integration: Develop custom logic, leveraging Cachex’s hooks or warmers, or a custom Nebulex adapter, to integrate the ML model’s predictions into the cache’s operations (e.g., proactive warming, dynamic eviction policies).
4. For Event Sourcing and CQRS Infrastructure:
   • CQRS/ES Framework: Choose Commanded for a comprehensive, opinionated framework, or Incident for a more modular, building-block approach, based on project needs and team preference.
   • Event Store: Utilize EventStore as the persistent, PostgreSQL-backed event store. Its maturity, data integrity guarantees, and built-in features for subscriptions and snapshots make it a highly recommended choice.
   • Projections: Use the respective projection libraries (Commanded.Projections.Ecto or Incident’s Projection Store) for building and persisting read models.
5. For Advanced Distributed State Management:
   • CRDT Foundation: Build distributed state objects using DeltaCrdt to leverage its efficient delta CRDTs and automatic conflict resolution, ensuring eventual consistency.
   • Distributed Process Management: Employ Horde for distributed supervision and registry, simplifying the management of distributed processes and their failover.
   • Causality Tracking: Integrate vector_clock to explicitly track the logical ordering and causality of events across the distributed system.
   • Network Partition Strategy: Design the system with explicit strategies for handling network partitions, acknowledging the eventual consistency model, and implementing robust state handoff mechanisms for long-lived processes.

By strategically adopting and integrating these Elixir and Erlang packages, a robust and highly performant “Foundation Enhancement Series IV: Advanced Infrastructure Primitives” can be successfully built, enabling the development of truly resilient and intelligent distributed applications.

Works cited

1. Scaling Elixir Applications with Load Balancers and Clustering - CloudDevs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://clouddevs.com/elixir/load-balancers-and-clustering/
2. Distributed Registry - Elixir Toolbox, accessed June 6, 2025, https://elixir-toolbox.dev/projects/releases/distributed_registry
3. Swarm – swarm v3.4.0 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/swarm/Swarm.html
4. talks/distributed_systems_in_elixir/Distributed Systems in Elixir.md at master - GitHub, accessed June 6, 2025, https://github.com/anildigital/talks/blob/master/distributed_systems_in_elixir/Distributed%20Systems%20in%20Elixir.md
5. Distributed Erlang — Erlang System Documentation v28.0, accessed June 6, 2025, https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/distributed.html
6. oltarasenko/erlang-node-discovery - GitHub, accessed June 6, 2025, https://github.com/oltarasenko/erlang-node-discovery
7. Meshx - service mesh support library - Elixir Forum, accessed June 6, 2025, https://elixirforum.com/t/meshx-service-mesh-support-library/39691
8. andrzej-mag/meshx: Service mesh support for Elixir - GitHub, accessed June 6, 2025, https://github.com/andrzej-mag/meshx
9. Meshx v0.1.0 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/meshx/
10. OTP Distribution - Elixir School, accessed June 6, 2025, https://elixirschool.com/en/lessons/advanced/otp_distribution
11. Foundation - Elixir Infrastructure and Observability Library - Libraries …, accessed June 6, 2025, https://elixirforum.com/t/foundation-elixir-infrastructure-and-observability-library/71153
12. aws_elbv2_target_group - Datadog Docs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://docs.datadoghq.com/infrastructure/resource_catalog/aws_elbv2_target_group/
13. List of Best Service Mesh Tools For Microservices - DevOpsCube, accessed June 6, 2025, https://devopscube.com/service-mesh-tools/
14. Asymmetrically distributed Elixir? - Reddit, accessed June 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/elixir/comments/1ao6dmr/asymmetrically_distributed_elixir/
15. dashbitco/broadway: Concurrent and multi-stage data ingestion and data processing with Elixir - GitHub, accessed June 6, 2025, https://github.com/dashbitco/broadway
16. Broadway — Broadway v1.2.1 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/broadway/Broadway.html
17. Creating Data Pipelines With Elixir - Semaphore, accessed June 6, 2025, https://semaphore.io/blog/data-pipelines-elixir
18. Flow — Flow v1.2.4 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/flow/Flow.html
19. Is it wise to default to always using Flow when using Broadway? - Elixir Forum, accessed June 6, 2025, https://elixirforum.com/t/is-it-wise-to-default-to-always-using-flow-when-using-broadway/69303
20. hamidreza-s/Espresso: An Erlang/Elixir Stream Processing … - GitHub, accessed June 6, 2025, https://github.com/hamidreza-s/Espresso
21. Back-Pressure Queuing System in Elixir - Nutrient, accessed June 6, 2025, https://www.nutrient.io/blog/back-pressure-queuing-system-with-sbroker/
22. cabol/gen_buffer: A generic message buffer behaviour with … - GitHub, accessed June 6, 2025, https://github.com/cabol/gen_buffer
23. Long-lived Process and State Recovery After Crashes, accessed June 6, 2025, https://rocket-science.ru/hacking/2025/03/09/long-lived-stateful-process
24. Building CQRS/ES web applications in Elixir using Phoenix - Binary Consulting, accessed June 6, 2025, https://10consulting.com/presentations/building-cqrs-es-web-applications-in-elixir/
25. Error Handling - Elixir School, accessed June 6, 2025, https://elixirschool.com/en/lessons/intermediate/error_handling
26. Safer Error Systems In Elixir - Learn-Elixir.dev, accessed June 6, 2025, https://learn-elixir.dev/blogs/safer-error-systems-in-elixir
27. Error Handling in Elixir and ErrorMessage — error_message v0.3.3 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/error_message/error_handling_in_elixir.html
28. ExternalService — external_service v1.1.4 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/external_service/
29. jvoegele/external_service: Elixir library for safely using any external service or API using automatic retry with rate limiting and circuit breakers. - GitHub, accessed June 6, 2025, https://github.com/jvoegele/external_service
30. Retry — retry v0.19.0 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/retry/Retry.html
31. Learn How to Use The Logstash Dead Letter Queue (DLQ) - Logit.io, accessed June 6, 2025, https://logit.io/docs/log-management/ingestion-pipeline/logstash-dead-letter-queue/
32. Dead letter queues (DLQ) | Logstash Reference [8.18] - Elastic, accessed June 6, 2025, https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/logstash/8.18/dead-letter-queues.html
33. Broadway v0.6.0-rc.0 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/broadway/0.6.0-rc.0/index.html
34. Am I missing something in regards to Errors? : r/elixir - Reddit, accessed June 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/elixir/comments/10nnqmm/am_i_missing_something_in_regards_to_errors/
35. Powerful Caching in Elixir with Cachex - AppSignal Blog, accessed June 6, 2025, https://blog.appsignal.com/2024/03/05/powerful-caching-in-elixir-with-cachex.html
36. Cachex v4.1.0 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/cachex/Cachex.html
37. Distributed Caches — Cachex v4.1.0 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/cachex/distributed-caches.html
38. Getting Started — Cachex v4.1.0 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/cachex/
39. Elixir Caching | LibHunt, accessed June 6, 2025, https://elixir.libhunt.com/categories/667-caching
40. How to easily do caching in Elixir - Reddit, accessed June 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/elixir/comments/10f92ed/how_to_easily_do_caching_in_elixir/
41. Multi-Layered Caching with Decorators in Elixir: Optimizing Performance and Scalability, accessed June 6, 2025, https://dev.to/darnahsan/multi-layered-caching-with-decorators-in-elixir-optimizing-performance-and-scalability-3gd7
42. Nebulex — Nebulex v2.6.5 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/nebulex/Nebulex.html
43. Erlang libraries — Elixir v1.18.4 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/elixir/erlang-libraries.html
44. Distributed Caching in Elixir - Stack Overflow, accessed June 6, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35930734/distributed-caching-in-elixir
45. MikaAK/elixir_cache: Caching in elixir with testing as a first priority, don’t let caching bog down your tests! - GitHub, accessed June 6, 2025, https://github.com/MikaAK/elixir_cache
46. georgeguimaraes/awesome-ml-gen-ai-elixir: A curated list of Machine Learning libraries and resources for the Elixir programming language. - GitHub, accessed June 6, 2025, https://github.com/georgeguimaraes/awesome-ml-gen-ai-elixir
47. Machine Learning in Elixir, accessed June 6, 2025, https://unidel.edu.ng/focelibrary/books/Machine%20Learning%20in%20Elixir%20(Sean%20Moriarity)%20(Z-Library).pdf
48. Nx — Nx v0.9.2 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/nx/Nx.html
49. axon/lib/axon.ex at main · elixir-nx/axon - GitHub, accessed June 6, 2025, https://github.com/elixir-nx/axon/blob/main/lib/axon.ex
50. Axon — Axon v0.7.0 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/axon/Axon.html
51. Bumblebee — Bumblebee v0.6.0 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/bumblebee/Bumblebee.html
52. Machine Learning - Elixir Merge, accessed June 6, 2025, https://elixirmerge.com/tags/machine-learning
53. Cache Eviction Policies | System Design - GeeksforGeeks, accessed June 6, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/cache-eviction-policies-system-design/
54. AshEvents: Event Sourcing Made Simple For Ash : r/elixir - Reddit, accessed June 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/elixir/comments/1khnkis/ashevents_event_sourcing_made_simple_for_ash/
55. A curated list of awesome Elixir and Command Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS) resources. - GitHub, accessed June 6, 2025, https://github.com/slashdotdash/awesome-elixir-cqrs
56. Commanded — Commanded v1.4.8 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/commanded/Commanded.html
57. documentation/snapshotting.md - Hex Preview, accessed June 6, 2025, https://preview.hex.pm/preview/ash_commanded/show/documentation/snapshotting.md
58. Commanded.Aggregates.Aggregate — Commanded v1.4.8 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/commanded/Commanded.Aggregates.Aggregate.html
59. commanded/guides/Aggregates.md at master - GitHub, accessed June 6, 2025, https://github.com/commanded/commanded/blob/master/guides/Aggregates.md
60. pedroassumpcao/incident: Event Sourcing and CQRS library in Elixir - GitHub, accessed June 6, 2025, https://github.com/pedroassumpcao/incident
61. incident v0.6.2 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/incident/readme.html
62. AshEvents: Event Sourcing Made Simple For Ash - Elixir Forum, accessed June 6, 2025, https://elixirforum.com/t/ashevents-event-sourcing-made-simple-for-ash/70777
63. Erlang & Elixir Weekly: “AshEvents: Event Sourcing Made…” - Mastodon, accessed June 6, 2025, https://mastodon.social/@erlang_discussions/114472445867128782
64. README.md - Hex Preview, accessed June 6, 2025, https://preview.hex.pm/preview/ash_commanded/show/README.md
65. EventStore v1.4.8 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/eventstore/
66. commanded/eventstore: Event store using PostgreSQL for persistence - GitHub, accessed June 6, 2025, https://github.com/commanded/eventstore
67. EventStore — EventStore v1.4.8 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/eventstore/EventStore.html
68. ExESDB - a BEAM-Native Event Store - Libraries - Elixir Programming Language Forum, accessed June 6, 2025, https://elixirforum.com/t/exesdb-a-beam-native-event-store/70200
69. Commanded.Projections.Ecto — commanded_ecto_projections v1.4.0 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/commanded_ecto_projections/
70. commanded-ecto-projections/README.md at master - GitHub, accessed June 6, 2025, https://github.com/commanded/commanded-ecto-projections/blob/master/README.md
71. Managing Distributed State with GenServers in Phoenix and Elixir | AppSignal Blog, accessed June 6, 2025, https://blog.appsignal.com/2024/10/29/managing-distributed-state-with-genservers-in-phoenix-and-elixir.html
72. How DeltaCrdt can help you write distributed Elixir applications - Moose Code Blog, accessed June 6, 2025, https://moosecode.nl/blog/how_deltacrdt_can_help_write_distributed_elixir_applications
73. In-Memory Distributed State with Delta CRDTs - WorkOS, accessed June 6, 2025, https://workos.com/blog/in-memory-distributed-state-with-delta-crdts
74. DeltaCrdt — delta_crdt v0.6.5 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/delta_crdt/DeltaCrdt.html
75. DeltaCrdt.CausalCrdt – delta_crdt v0.1.2 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/delta_crdt/0.1.2/DeltaCrdt.CausalCrdt.html
76. DeltaCrdt.AWLWWMap – delta_crdt v0.2.1 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/delta_crdt/0.2.1/DeltaCrdt.AWLWWMap.html
77. [PDF] Delta state replicated data types - Semantic Scholar, accessed June 6, 2025, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Delta-state-replicated-data-types-Almeida-Shoker/05009141302f022fcf7387b37c8d9a2c415ead7b
78. Conflict-free Replicated Data Types: An Overview - ResearchGate, accessed June 6, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326029390_Conflict-free_Replicated_Data_Types_An_Overview
79. Log-Structured Conflict-Free Replicated Data Types - UCSB Computer Science, accessed June 6, 2025, https://www.cs.ucsb.edu/sites/default/files/documents/paper_9.pdf
80. CRDTs - Explained - Unzip.dev, accessed June 6, 2025, https://unzip.dev/0x018-crdts/
81. michalmuskala/horde: Persistent, distributed processes for Elixir - GitHub, accessed June 6, 2025, https://github.com/michalmuskala/horde
82. Horde v0.9.0 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/horde/
83. accessed December 31, 1969, https://hexdocs.pm/horde/Horde.html
84. Horde timeout error during deployments - Questions / Help - Elixir Forum, accessed June 6, 2025, https://elixirforum.com/t/horde-timeout-error-during-deployments/70666
85. Introducing Horde -- a distributed Supervisor in Elixir - Moose Code Blog, accessed June 6, 2025, https://moosecode.nl/blog/introducing_horde
86. Eventual Consistency — Horde v0.9.0 - HexDocs, accessed June 6, 2025, https://hexdocs.pm/horde/eventual_consistency.html
87. jschneider1207/vector_clock: Vector Clocks in Elixir! - GitHub, accessed June 6, 2025, https://github.com/jschneider1207/vector_clock
88. Erlang/Elixir native Etcd, Zookeeper alternative, accessed June 6, 2025, https://elixirforum.com/t/erlang-elixir-native-etcd-zookeeper-alternative/11874
89. Distributed application - network split - Questions / Help - Elixir Forum, accessed June 6, 2025, https://elixirforum.com/t/distributed-application-network-split/10007
90. Clustering and Network Partitions - RabbitMQ, accessed June 6, 2025, https://www.rabbitmq.com/docs/partitions
91. Distributed Elixir made easy with Spawn | eigr.io, accessed June 6, 2025, https://eigr.io/blog/distributed-elixir-made-easy-with-spawn/
92. Creating Process Continuity in Distributed Elixir - Mechanical Orchard, accessed June 6, 2025, https://www.mechanical-orchard.com/insights/creating-process-continuity-in-distributed-elixir