← Back to Docs

IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP

Documentation for IMPLEMENTATION_ROADMAP from the Dspex repository.

DSPy-Ash Implementation Roadmap: Complete Technical Guide

Executive Summary

This roadmap provides a complete implementation plan for the minimum viable DSPy-Ash integration, combining native signature syntax with production-ready infrastructure. The implementation follows a 4-stage approach, each building on the previous stage to create a comprehensive ML platform.

Architecture Overview

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                     Production APIs                          │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  GraphQL API  │  REST API   │  WebSocket  │  Admin UI      │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                    Ash Domain Layer                          │
│  Program      │  Signature  │  Execution  │  Optimization  │
│  Model        │  Dataset    │  Pipeline   │  Experiment    │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│               Custom Data Layer & Adapters                   │
│  Python Port  │  Native     │  Multi-Model │  Router       │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│            Infrastructure & Monitoring                       │
│  Background   │  Telemetry  │  Health     │  Deployment    │
│  Jobs         │  Metrics    │  Checks     │  Automation    │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Implementation Stages

Stage 1: Foundation (Week 1-2)

Goal: Execute simple DSPy programs through Ash with native signature syntax

Key Components:

  • ✅ Native signature syntax with compile-time processing
  • ✅ Python bridge with port-based communication
  • ✅ Basic Ash resources (Program, Signature, Execution)
  • ✅ Simple adapter pattern for future extensibility

Deliverables:

  • Working signature compilation: signature question: :string -> answer: :string
  • Python bridge executing basic DSPy programs
  • Ash resources with CRUD operations
  • Basic validation and error handling

Stage 2: Core Operations (Week 3-4)

Goal: Production-ready execution with validation and state management

Key Components:

  • ✅ Custom Ash data layer bridging DSPy operations
  • ✅ ExDantic integration for Pydantic-like validation
  • ✅ Enhanced Python bridge with optimization support
  • ✅ Execution tracking with performance metrics

Deliverables:

  • Custom data layer handling DSPy actions transparently
  • Full input/output validation with type coercion
  • State synchronization between Ash and DSPy
  • Performance monitoring and error tracking

Stage 3: Production Features (Week 5-6)

Goal: Complete production system with APIs and monitoring

Key Components:

  • ✅ Automatic GraphQL/REST API generation
  • ✅ Background job processing with AshOban
  • ✅ Real-time subscriptions for long-running operations
  • ✅ Comprehensive telemetry and alerting

Deliverables:

  • Full GraphQL API with subscriptions
  • Background optimization jobs
  • Performance monitoring with LiveDashboard
  • Dataset management and experiment tracking

Stage 4: Advanced Features (Week 7-8)

Goal: Enterprise-ready platform with advanced ML capabilities

Key Components:

  • ✅ Multi-model orchestration with intelligent routing
  • ✅ Automated deployment pipelines
  • ✅ Advanced optimization algorithms
  • ✅ Comprehensive experiment management

Deliverables:

  • Model registry with health monitoring
  • Deployment automation with canary releases
  • Multi-objective optimization algorithms
  • Statistical experiment analysis

Core Innovation: Signature Syntax

Native Syntax Examples

# Simple Q&A
defmodule QASignature do
  use DSPex.Signature
  signature question: :string -> answer: :string, confidence: :float
end

# Complex RAG
defmodule RAGSignature do  
  use DSPex.Signature
  signature query: :string, documents: list[:string] ->
    answer: :string,
    sources: list[:string], 
    confidence: :probability
end

# Multi-input reasoning
defmodule ReasoningSignature do
  use DSPex.Signature
  signature problem: :string, context: :string ->
    reasoning: :reasoning_chain,
    answer: :string,
    confidence: :probability
end

Automatic Resource Generation

Each signature automatically becomes:

  • Ash resource with full CRUD operations
  • GraphQL types with queries and mutations
  • ExDantic schemas for validation
  • JSON schemas for LLM integration
  • Type-safe interfaces with compile-time checking

Technical Architecture

1. Signature Compilation Pipeline

# Input: Native syntax
signature question: :string -> answer: :string, confidence: :float

# Step 1: AST parsing at compile time
{inputs: [{:question, :string, []}], outputs: [{:answer, :string, []}, {:confidence, :float, []}]}

# Step 2: ExDantic schema generation  
input_schema = Exdantic.Runtime.create_schema([{:question, :string, [required: true]}])

# Step 3: Ash resource integration
defstruct [:question, :answer, :confidence]
def validate_inputs(data), do: Exdantic.validate(input_schema, data)

# Step 4: JSON schema for LLMs
%{"type" => "object", "properties" => %{"question" => %{"type" => "string"}}}

2. Custom Data Layer Integration

# Ash Query -> Custom Data Layer -> DSPy Adapter -> Python/Native
DSPex.ML.Program.execute(program, %{inputs: %{question: "What is AI?"}})
   
DSPex.DataLayer.run_query(query, resource, context)
  
DSPex.Adapters.PythonPort.execute_program(program_id, inputs)
    
DSPex.PythonBridge.call(:execute, %{program_id: id, inputs: inputs})
  
Python DSPy execution via port communication
  
{:ok, %{answer: "AI is...", confidence: 0.87}}

3. Multi-Model Orchestration

# Intelligent model routing based on:
# - Performance requirements (latency vs accuracy)
# - Cost constraints  
# - Model availability and health
# - Input characteristics

case DSPex.ML.ModelRouter.select_model(program, inputs) do
  {:ok, program_model} ->
    # Route to optimal model (GPT-4, Claude, local, etc.)
    adapter = get_adapter_for_model(program_model.model)
    adapter.execute_program(program_id, inputs, model_config)
    
  {:error, reason} ->
    # Fallback strategy
    try_fallback_model(program, inputs)
end

Key Benefits

1. Developer Experience

  • Beautiful syntax: No ceremony, just question: :string -> answer: :string
  • Type safety: Compile-time checking with runtime validation
  • IDE integration: Full autocompletion and refactoring support
  • Gradual adoption: Works alongside existing Elixir code

2. Production Ready

  • Automatic APIs: GraphQL and REST generated from signatures
  • Observability: Built-in metrics, tracing, and health monitoring
  • Scalability: BEAM concurrency with intelligent request routing
  • Reliability: State machines, error recovery, and deployment automation

3. ML-First Features

  • Experiment management: A/B testing with statistical analysis
  • Model registry: Health monitoring and cost optimization
  • Advanced optimization: Multi-objective algorithms balancing accuracy/cost/latency
  • Deployment automation: Canary releases with automatic rollback

4. Ecosystem Integration

  • ExDantic: Pydantic-like validation in Elixir
  • Ash ecosystem: AshGraphQL, AshOban, AshPaperTrail, etc.
  • Phoenix: Real-time subscriptions and admin interfaces
  • Telemetry: LiveDashboard and production monitoring

Implementation Priority Matrix

Must Have (MVP)

  • ✅ Native signature syntax compilation
  • ✅ Python bridge with basic DSPy execution
  • ✅ Ash resources with CRUD operations
  • ✅ Custom data layer bridging Ash ↔ DSPy
  • ✅ ExDantic validation integration
  • ✅ Basic GraphQL API generation

Should Have (Production)

  • ✅ Background job processing
  • ✅ Performance monitoring and alerting
  • ✅ Real-time subscriptions
  • ✅ Dataset management
  • ✅ Execution history and analytics

Could Have (Advanced)

  • ✅ Multi-model orchestration
  • ✅ Deployment automation
  • ✅ Advanced optimization algorithms
  • ✅ Experiment management platform

Risk Mitigation

Technical Risks

  1. Python bridge stability → Supervision trees, health checks, automatic restart
  2. Performance overhead → Compile-time optimization, connection pooling, caching
  3. Type safety gaps → Comprehensive validation, runtime checks, graceful degradation

Integration Risks

  1. Ash compatibility → Custom data layer isolates DSPy concerns
  2. ExDantic integration → Well-defined interfaces, extensive testing
  3. Python dependencies → Containerization, version pinning, fallback strategies

Operational Risks

  1. Scaling challenges → Model routing, load balancing, resource management
  2. Monitoring gaps → Comprehensive telemetry, health checks, alerting
  3. Deployment complexity → Automation, staging environments, rollback procedures

Success Metrics

Development Velocity

  • Time to create program: < 5 minutes from signature to execution
  • API generation: Automatic GraphQL/REST with zero configuration
  • Type safety: 100% compile-time signature validation

Production Performance

  • Execution latency: < 100ms overhead beyond DSPy
  • System availability: > 99.9% uptime with proper monitoring
  • Cost optimization: Intelligent model routing reducing costs by 20-40%

Developer Satisfaction

  • Learning curve: Familiar Elixir patterns, minimal DSPy knowledge required
  • Debugging experience: Clear error messages, comprehensive logging
  • Extensibility: Easy to add new module types, optimizers, metrics

Future Roadmap

Short Term (3 months)

  • Native Elixir DSPy modules (starting with Predict)
  • Advanced prompt optimization algorithms
  • Integration with vector databases for RAG
  • Enhanced experiment analysis and visualization

Medium Term (6 months)

  • GPU acceleration for local models
  • Distributed optimization across multiple nodes
  • Advanced prompt engineering tools
  • Integration with MLOps platforms

Long Term (12 months)

  • Complete native DSPy implementation in Elixir
  • Advanced reasoning capabilities (ReAct, ProgramOfThought)
  • Multi-agent orchestration frameworks
  • Industry-specific ML templates and workflows

Getting Started

Prerequisites

  • Elixir 1.15+
  • Phoenix 1.7+
  • PostgreSQL 14+
  • Python 3.9+ with DSPy
  • Basic familiarity with Ash framework

Quick Start

# 1. Clone and setup
git clone <repository>
cd dspex
mix deps.get
mix ecto.setup

# 2. Start development server
mix phx.server

# 3. Create your first signature
defmodule MySignature do
  use DSPex.Signature
  signature question: :string -> answer: :string
end

# 4. Execute via GraphQL
mutation {
  executeProgram(programId: "...", inputs: {question: "Hello!"}) {
    answer
    confidence
  }
}

Conclusion

This implementation roadmap delivers on the vision of making DSPy more elegant and production-ready than its Python counterpart. By combining:

  • Native signature syntax that eliminates ceremony
  • Ash’s production infrastructure for APIs and state management
  • ExDantic’s validation for Pydantic-like behavior
  • BEAM’s concurrency for scalable ML operations

We create a truly unique ML platform that’s both developer-friendly and enterprise-ready. The staged implementation approach ensures each phase delivers value while building toward the complete vision.

Ready to revolutionize ML infrastructure in the BEAM ecosystem.