Stage 4 Overview: Production Hardening Architecture
Context
You are implementing Stage 4 of the DSPex system, focusing on production hardening and advanced features. This stage transforms the DSPex bridge from a functional prototype into a production-ready system with enterprise-grade reliability, security, and performance.
Critical Architectural Decision
ALL advanced features in Stage 4 are implemented ONLY in the BridgedState backend. This is a key architectural decision that:
- Keeps the fast path fast - pure Elixir workflows remain simple and performant
- Adds complexity only where needed - hybrid workflows get enterprise features
- Ensures clean separation of concerns
- Allows future distributed backends without changing core logic
Overview
Stage 4 introduces:
- Dependency graphs with cycle detection
- Distributed optimizer coordination
- Fine-grained access control
- Performance analytics and monitoring
- High availability patterns
- Circuit breaker implementations
- Production deployment strategies
Architecture
Production Features Layer (BridgedState Only)
├── Dependency Manager (Graph data structure)
├── Optimizer Coordinator (Distributed locking)
├── Access Control System
├── Analytics Engine
└── HA Manager
BridgedState Backend
├── SessionStore (Enhanced with production features)
├── gRPC Handlers (With circuit breakers)
├── ObserverManager (Enhanced monitoring)
└── Circuit Breaker (Resilience pattern)
Monitoring & Observability
├── Telemetry
├── Metrics
└── Distributed Tracing
Future Distributed Backends
├── Redis/Valkey (For distributed state)
└── Raft/etcd (For consensus)
Implementation Phases
Stage 4 is intentionally large and should be implemented iteratively:
- First iteration: Dependency Management
- Second iteration: Optimization Coordination
- Third iteration: Security & Access Control
- Fourth iteration: HA & Recovery Patterns
Key Design Principles
Distributed-Ready: All components use GenServers initially but are designed to swap in distributed backends (Redis, Raft) without logic changes
Operational Maturity: Analytics and HAManager are first-class concerns, not afterthoughts
Resilience First: Circuit breakers explicitly protect Elixir from Python-side failures
Zero Trust: Complete session isolation with fine-grained permissions
Observable by Default: Every operation emits telemetry for monitoring
Success Criteria
- Dependency graphs prevent circular dependencies
- Optimizers coordinate without conflicts
- Access control enforces permissions consistently
- Analytics provide comprehensive visibility
- Sessions migrate seamlessly for HA
- Circuit breakers prevent cascading failures
Files You’ll Need
/home/home/p/g/n/dspex/docs/specs/unified_grpc_bridge/44_revised_stage4_prod_hardening.md
- Full specification/home/home/p/g/n/dspex/docs/STAGE_4_ADVANCED_FEATURES.md
- Original stage 4 vision
Testing Approach
Each production feature requires:
- Unit tests for core logic
- Integration tests for failure modes
- Performance benchmarks
- Load testing scenarios
Example Implementation Pattern
When implementing any Stage 4 feature, follow this pattern:
defmodule DSPex.Bridge.ProductionFeature do
@moduledoc """
Production feature for BridgedState backend only.
"""
use GenServer
require Logger
# Start with GenServer for single-node
def start_link(opts) do
GenServer.start_link(__MODULE__, opts, name: __MODULE__)
end
# Design API for distributed future
def operation(key, value, opts \\ []) do
GenServer.call(__MODULE__, {:operation, key, value, opts})
end
# Emit telemetry for observability
defp emit_telemetry(event, measurements, metadata) do
:telemetry.execute(
[:dspex, :bridge, :feature | event],
measurements,
metadata
)
end
# Handle failures gracefully
defp handle_failure(error, context) do
Logger.error("Feature failed: #{inspect(error)}", context: context)
{:error, :service_unavailable}
end
end
Next Steps
Start with implementing the Dependency Manager (prompt 41), as it forms the foundation for reactive variable updates and optimization coordination.