← Back to Docs

TEST FAILURE ANALYSIS gemini

Documentation for TEST_FAILURE_ANALYSIS_gemini from the Dspex repository.

Of course. This is a fascinating set of test failures. They are not isolated bugs but rather symptoms of a few core design flaws in the testing architecture and, to a lesser extent, the application’s code.

Here is a deep analysis of the test output, identifying the underlying design flaws that cause these errors.

Executive Summary

The primary issue is a fragile and failing distributed test environment setup. The test suite attempts to create a multi-node Elixir/Erlang cluster but fails because the primary test runner process is not itself a distributed node. This single failure cascades, causing all distributed tests to either fail outright or fall back to a “single-node” mode where their multi-node assertions are logically incorrect.

Secondary issues include the use of deprecated APIs, dead code due to incorrect type specifications, and inconsistent node counting logic in simulated vs. real distributed modes.

Flaw 1: Fragile Distributed Test Setup (The Root Cause)

This is the central problem from which almost all other failures stem.

Evidence:

  1. Warning: Could not start distributed node: ... {:EXIT, :nodistribution}
  2. Skipping distributed tests - running in single node mode
  3. Failures #6, 7, 8: (ErlangError) Erlang error: :not_alive

Analysis:

The error {:EXIT, :nodistribution} is a definitive sign that the Erlang VM running the mix test command was not started with distribution enabled (i.e., without the --sname or --name flags). The net_kernel is the core Erlang process responsible for distributed communication, and it cannot start without these flags.

The test helper code in test/support/cluster_test_helper.ex and test/support/distributed_test_case.ex attempts to spawn “slave” or “peer” nodes. These functions require the host node (the one running the tests) to be a distributed node so they can connect back to it.

The :not_alive error in failures #6, 7, and 8 confirms this. The peer module is trying to connect to the main test node, but from a distributed perspective, that node is “not alive” because it hasn’t registered with the Erlang Port Mapper Daemon (epmd) and isn’t listening for connections.

Design Flaw:

The design flaw is relying on the default mix test environment to support distributed node creation. The test suite’s setup blocks are designed with the assumption of a distributed environment, but they don’t ensure that environment exists. This makes the tests brittle and environment-dependent. A developer running mix test without specific configuration will always see these failures.

Recommendations:

  1. Robust Setup Script: The project should have a dedicated test script (e.g., test/run_dist_tests.sh) that starts the test runner with the necessary flags, for example: elixir --sname test_primary -S mix test --include distributed.
  2. In-Code Setup (Advanced): The DistributedTestCase could be rewritten to programmatically restart the test node in distributed mode if it isn’t already. This is complex but provides a seamless developer experience.
  3. Clear Documentation: At a minimum, the CONTRIBUTING.md or test/README.md must clearly state the command required to run the distributed test suite.

Flaw 2: Ineffective Test Skipping and Fallback Logic

The test suite detects the distribution failure and tries to adapt, but this adaptation is incomplete, leading to a wave of assertion failures.

Evidence:

  1. Skipping distributed tests - running in single node mode
  2. Failures #1, 2, 3, 5: All are assertion failures in MultiNodeTest where the expected number of nodes (e.g., 2, 3, 4) does not match the actual number (e.g., 1 or 3).
  3. Failure #4: A MatchError because a function returned {:error, :node_not_found} when the test unconditionally expected {:ok, ...}.

Analysis:

The MultiNodeTest suite is designed to test “simulation mode,” where the system pretends to be a cluster. When the real cluster setup fails, the code under test correctly operates in single-node mode.

However, the tests themselves are not being properly skipped. They continue to run and make assertions based on a successful multi-node setup.

  • assert map_size(process_dist) == 4 fails because only 1 node (the primary) is “running”.
  • assert length(updated_status.nodes) == 3 fails for the same reason.
  • The tests expecting 2 nodes but getting 3 (length(process_data.nodes_queried) == 2 -> left: 3) suggests that the simulation logic is adding simulated nodes, but the code is also counting the real node, leading to an off-by-one error in this fallback path. This points to inconsistent logic between the “real distributed” and “simulated distributed” modes.
  • The MatchError in test #4 is a classic example of overly optimistic testing. The test doesn’t account for the possibility that the node it’s looking for won’t be found in the failed-fallback scenario.

Design Flaw:

The test design improperly handles the fallback scenario. Announcing “Skipping distributed tests” is not enough; the individual tests must be programmatically skipped. The current design allows tests to run in an environment they were not designed for, guaranteeing failure.

Recommendations:

  1. Use ExUnit Tags: The distributed tests should be tagged (e.g., @tag :distributed). The setup block in DistributedTestCase should check if the cluster was created successfully. If not, it should configure ExUnit to skip all tests with the :distributed tag. This is the idiomatic Elixir way.
  2. Conditional Assertions: Alternatively, the tests could be written to make different assertions based on the mode (e.g., if in_distributed_mode(), do: (assert ...), else: (assert ...)), but this makes tests much harder to read and maintain. Tag-based skipping is superior.
  3. Fix the Optimistic Match: The test at multi_node_test.exs:155 should handle the error case instead of causing a MatchError. It should explicitly assert that the function fails, e.g., assert {:error, :node_not_found} = NodeInfo.execute(...).

Flaw 3: Technical Debt and Code Health Issues

These are less severe but indicate a lack of maintenance and attention to compiler warnings.

Evidence:

  1. warning: :slave.start_link/2 is deprecated. It will be removed in OTP 29.
  2. warning: the following clause will never match: {:error, _} in multi_node_test.exs:107.

Analysis:

  1. Deprecated API: The use of :slave is outdated. The Erlang/OTP team has provided the peer module as a modern replacement. Continuing to use :slave builds technical debt and will cause the application to break on future OTP versions.
  2. Typing Violation / Dead Code: The Elixir compiler’s type checker (Dialyzer) has correctly identified that the function OTPSupervisor.Core.Arsenal.Operations.Distributed.ClusterHealth.validate_params/1 is specified to only return {:ok, term()}. Therefore, the case statement’s {:error, _} clause is unreachable dead code. This represents a disconnect between the code’s implementation (or its type specification) and its usage.

Design Flaw:

  • Failure to Keep Dependencies Current: The code is not being updated to align with the evolution of its underlying platform (Erlang/OTP).
  • Inaccurate Type Specifications: The typespec for validate_params/1 is likely incorrect. It probably can fail, but this possibility is not declared in its type. This misleads the compiler and other developers, and it prevented the compiler from catching the optimistic match error in Test #4.

Recommendations:

  1. Update Deprecated Code: Heed the compiler’s advice. Replace all uses of :slave.start_link/2 with the equivalent functions in the peer module.
  2. Correct the Typespec: Investigate validate_params/1. If it can indeed return an error, update its @spec to reflect this (e.g., @spec validate_params(map) :: {:ok, term()} | {:error, term()}). This will make the type checker more effective and remove the “unreachable clause” warning. If it truly can’t fail, then remove the dead {:error, _} clause from the case statement.