Codebase Review: Distributed Computing Readiness
Executive Summary
This document assesses the foundation
codebase for its readiness to be extended into a distributed system using libcluster
and Horde
. The current architecture is well-positioned for distribution but is not yet fully distributed. It has been designed with distribution in mind, featuring clear abstractions and a separation of concerns that will greatly simplify the transition. However, several key components are currently implemented with a single-node focus and will require modification to work in a clustered environment.
Core Strengths for Distribution
The codebase has a solid foundation for evolving into a distributed system:
Pluggable Backends (
ProcessRegistry.Backend
): The decision to define aBackend
behavior for theProcessRegistry
is a critical architectural strength. It allows the underlying storage mechanism to be swapped out. The existence of a (placeholder)Horde
backend demonstrates foresight. To make the registry distributed, one would simply need to implement theBackend
behavior usingHorde.Registry
and change the application configuration. This is a clean and low-friction path to a distributed service registry.Service-Oriented Architecture: The codebase is broken down into distinct services (
ConfigServer
,EventStore
,AgentRegistry
, etc.), each with a well-defined responsibility. This modularity is essential for distribution, as it allows different services to potentially run on different nodes in the cluster.Stateless Modules: Many modules, such as
Foundation.MABEAM.Agent
, are stateless facades that delegate their work to stateful services. This is a good pattern for distribution, as it decouples the business logic from the state, making it easier to reason about where state lives in a cluster.Abstraction of Communication (
Foundation.MABEAM.Comms
): TheComms
module centralizes inter-agent communication. While the current implementation usesGenServer.call
, this module can be extended to use a distributed messaging system (likeHorde.Process
or standard BEAM distribution) to send messages to agents on remote nodes transparently.
Areas Requiring Modification for Distribution
While the foundation is strong, significant work is needed to make the system fully distributed.
Single-Point-of-Failure GenServers: Several core components are single
GenServer
processes, which would become bottlenecks or single points of failure in a distributed system. These include:Foundation.MABEAM.Coordination
Foundation.MABEAM.Economics
Foundation.MABEAM.AgentRegistry
Foundation.MABEAM.LoadBalancer
Foundation.MABEAM.PerformanceMonitor
To be truly distributed, these services would need to be re-architected. The best approach would be to use
Horde.DynamicSupervisor
to distribute the agents/sessions they manage across the cluster, andHorde.Registry
to locate them.Local ETS Tables: The
ProcessRegistry.Backend.ETS
andCoordination.Primitives
use local ETS tables for storage. In a distributed environment, this data would not be shared across nodes. TheHorde
backend for the process registry is the intended solution here. For the coordination primitives, a distributed consensus tool likeRaft
(or a library wrapping it) would be needed to manage distributed state.Hardcoded Local PIDs: The code frequently looks up a service in the registry and then uses its PID for communication. This works on a single node, but in a distributed system, the process may be on a remote node. While Elixir’s distribution makes this transparent, the logic for service discovery needs to be robust to handle remote PIDs. The use of
ServiceRegistry
andProcessRegistry
abstracts this well, so the primary change would be in the backend implementation.Node.self()
andNode.list()
: TheCoordination.Primitives
module usesNode.self()
andNode.list()
to determine cluster membership. This is the correct approach, but it assumes thatlibcluster
is configured and running to manage the node list dynamically. The code is ready forlibcluster
, but the dependency and configuration are not yet present.RPC Usage: The
Coordination.Primitives
module uses:rpc.call
for inter-node communication. While functional, this is often considered a less robust approach than sending messages to registered processes. A better long-term solution would be to have distributed processes (managed byHorde
) that communicate viaGenServer.call
orcast
.
Path to Distribution with libcluster
and Horde
- Add Dependencies: Add
libcluster
andhorde
to themix.exs
file. - Configure
libcluster
: Configure a clustering strategy (e.g.,Gossip
) inconfig/config.exs
to allow nodes to discover each other automatically. - Implement
Horde
Backend: Complete theFoundation.ProcessRegistry.Backend.Horde
module, usingHorde.Registry
for all theBackend
callbacks. This will provide a distributed, fault-tolerant service registry. - Refactor Core Services: Re-architect the single-process services (
Coordination
,Economics
, etc.) to be distributed. This is the most significant part of the work. A good pattern would be:- Use
Horde.DynamicSupervisor
to start and supervise agents/sessions across the cluster. - Use
Horde.Registry
to register and discover these distributed processes. - The main service module (
Foundation.MABEAM.Coordination
) would then become a stateless facade that uses the distributed registry to find and communicate with the appropriate worker process, wherever it is in the cluster.
- Use
- Update
Comms
Module: Modify theComms
module to use the distributedProcessRegistry
to find agents (which could be on any node) and send messages to them.
Conclusion
The foundation
codebase is well-prepared but not yet ready for distributed computing. The architects have clearly planned for a distributed future by creating the right abstractions (pluggable backends, service-oriented design). The path to a fully distributed system is clear, but it will require implementing the Horde
backend and refactoring the core stateful services to leverage Horde
for distributed supervision and registration. The codebase is in an excellent position to make this transition smoothly.