← Back to Foundation

GOOGLE PROFESSOR CONTEXT

Documentation for GOOGLE_PROFESSOR_CONTEXT from the Foundation repository.

Context for Google Professor: JidoSystem Distribution Architecture Review

Overview

We are building JidoSystem, an agent-based framework in Elixir that integrates with a Foundation infrastructure layer. The system is currently designed for single-node deployment but needs to be architected with future distribution in mind. We want to identify the minimum necessary changes to support eventual migration to true distributed systems (using libcluster, Horde, or modern alternatives) without over-engineering for requirements we don’t currently have.

Current Architecture

Three-Layer System

  1. Foundation Layer: Protocol-based infrastructure (Registry, Coordination, Infrastructure)
  2. Jido Framework: Agent-based system with actions, sensors, and signals
  3. JidoFoundation.Bridge: Integration layer between the two

Key Components

  • Agents communicate via message-passing with instructions
  • State is managed locally within each agent process
  • Registry tracks agent PIDs and metadata
  • No current distribution primitives

Documentation Package

The following markdown files provide comprehensive analysis of the current system and proposed improvements:

1. JIDO_DIAL_approach.md

  • Identifies critical missing infrastructure (Cache, CircuitBreaker)
  • Shows how test mocks hide production issues
  • Outlines implementation priorities

2. JIDO_DIAL_tests.md

  • Comprehensive test cases for missing functionality
  • Contract tests to ensure mock-production parity
  • Integration test strategies

3. JIDO_ARCH.md

  • Complete system architecture overview
  • Component relationships and data flows
  • Integration patterns between layers

4. JIDO_BUILDOUT_PAIN_POINTS.md

  • Architectural issues and anti-patterns
  • Mock-driven development problems
  • Missing distributed systems considerations

5. JIDO_PLATFORM_ARCHITECTURE.md

  • Future state platform design
  • Unified architecture vision
  • Migration path from current state

6. JIDO_TESTING_STRATEGY.md

  • How to bridge mock-based testing to production reality
  • Contract testing approach
  • Chaos and load testing strategies

7. JIDO_OPERATIONAL_EXCELLENCE.md

  • Production operations guide
  • Monitoring and observability
  • Deployment and incident management

8. JIDO_DISTRIBUTION_READINESS.md (NEW)

  • Analysis of minimum requirements for distribution readiness
  • Identifies what to build now vs. defer
  • Specific architectural boundaries needed

Code Context

The codebase includes:

  • lib/foundation/ - Protocol definitions and facade
  • lib/jido_system/ - Agent implementations and actions
  • lib/jido_foundation/ - Bridge integration layer
  • test/ - Test suites (currently using mocks)

Key Concerns

  1. Current State: Tests pass but the system has fundamental issues due to mock dependencies hiding missing production code
  2. Single Node Assumption: Code directly uses PIDs, assumes local execution, no network failure handling
  3. Future Distribution: Need to prepare for eventual distribution without over-building now
  4. lib_old Legacy: Previous attempt at distribution was “partially met under wrong broken architecture”

Specific Questions for Review

  1. Minimum Distribution Boundary: What is the absolute minimum we need to change in our single-node architecture to enable smooth evolution to distributed systems later?

  2. Abstraction Level: Are the proposed abstractions (AgentRef, Message envelope, Communication layer) at the right level, or are we over/under-engineering?

  3. State Consistency: Given we’re starting with single-node, how should we prepare our state management APIs for eventual consistency without implementing distribution now?

  4. Testing Strategy: How can we test distribution readiness without actually implementing distribution?

  5. Common Pitfalls: What are the most common mistakes teams make when evolving from single-node to distributed systems that we should avoid?

Success Criteria

We want a system that:

  • Works perfectly on a single node today
  • Can evolve to multi-node within a datacenter without major refactoring
  • Can eventually support geo-distributed deployment with appropriate libraries
  • Doesn’t carry unnecessary complexity for features we don’t need yet
  • Has clear architectural boundaries that won’t change during evolution

Additional Context

  • We’re using Elixir/OTP, so we have actor model and supervision trees
  • Performance is important but not at the cost of correctness
  • We expect to run on Kubernetes eventually
  • The system processes ML workloads through agents
  • Current scale: hundreds of agents, future scale: thousands across multiple nodes

Request

Please review the provided documentation, especially JIDO_DISTRIBUTION_READINESS.md, and provide guidance on:

  1. Whether our identified minimum distribution boundaries are correct
  2. What critical aspects we might be missing
  3. Specific anti-patterns to avoid
  4. Recommended incremental steps toward distribution
  5. How to validate our architecture is truly distribution-ready without implementing distribution